Joe gets up at 6 a.m. and fills his coffeepot with water to prepare his morning coffee. The water is clean and good because some tree-hugging liberal fought for minimum water-quality standards.
Speaking of water, farmers in California were denied water for their crops in California because it would endanger the Smelt thanks to the liberals, but please continue....
With his first swallow of water, he takes his daily medication. His medications are safe to take because some stupid commie liberal fought to ensure their safety and that they work as advertised.
While some folks badly in need of new life saving medication have no access to it because it is stalled in bureaucracy imposed by liberal standards, they must suffer for years, even decades or find a way to get it in foreign countries...carry on....
All but $10 of his medications are paid for by his employer's medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for paid medical insurance
Medical insurance tied to employees of jobs provide union imposed benefits that have driven many companies to relocate to foreign countries so that can operate. Why should medical insurance even be tied to employment benefits? Affordable health insurance should be offered to every American at the same rates offered to employers who can offer the coverage by buying in bulk.
- now Joe gets it too.
Like I said, anyone could have it if it was offered at the same rate without being tied to employment. Affordable rates would be possible if insurance companies could compete for business across state lines.
He prepares his morning breakfast, bacon and eggs. Joe's bacon is safe to eat because some girly-man liberal fought for laws to regulate the meat packing industry.
While more regulations imposed on farmers cause more farmers to go bankrupt and more farms to fold...rising grocery costs deny many low and middle class families the ability to buy quality food for balanced meals. While I agree that regulations should be in force for the quality and safety of our food products, not to mention the humane treatment of the animals involved, the bureaucratic system needs to be simplified so the regulations can actually be economically feasible to enforce.
In the morning shower, Joe reaches for his shampoo. His bottle is properly labeled with each ingredient and its amount in the total contents because some crybaby liberal fought for his right to know what he was putting on his body and how much it contained.
Labels are beginning to read like War and Peace. Enjoy the read...great work Mr. Liberal.
Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath. The air he breathes is clean because some environmentalist wacko liberal fought for the laws to stop industries from polluting our air.
No argument from this Conservative.
He walks to the subway station for his government-subsidized ride to work.
Aw, come on. People made it to work for decades without subsidized transportation to get there. Put it in your budget, Mr. Liberal.
It saves him considerable money in parking and transportation fees because some fancy-pants liberal fought for affordable public transportation, which gives everyone the opportunity to be a contributor.
Like I said...put the transportation costs in your budget. We people who don't live in the big cities buy our own vehicles and gasoline to get to work everyday. Why should we have to subsidize your ride to work while we pay for ours? Want us to pack your lunch and walk you to the bus stop, too?
Joe begins his work day. He has a good job with excellent pay, medical benefits, retirement, paid holidays and vacation because some lazy liberal union members fought and died for these working standards.
Many jobs are no longer in the United States because of unions breaking the backs of the employers with more and more demands. The industry and business that stays in the U.S.A. just pass the costs on to the consumers in higher prices. Those wages and benefits are being paid for by every consumer in the country, including the union wage earners. They see these big pay raises and increased benefits, yet the raises are quickly lost in the higher prices they must pay to be a consumer. Their health care benefits are better, but the costs are also higher, in case you didn't notice your paycheck may actually be a little smaller because of the portion you must pay for your coverage has increased. And Joe Average who works in the non-union jobs and is happy for receive a fair, living wage is impacted by these costs also.
Joe's employer pays these standards because Joe's employer doesn't want his employees to call the union. If Joe is hurt on the job or becomes unemployed, he'll get a worker compensation or unemployment check because some stupid liberal didn't think he should lose his home because of his temporary misfortune.
Why should employers have to fear unions. Employers are providing jobs and taking the fiscal risks of a free market to provide these jobs. As for accidents and unemployment, the advantages received will not save your home in catastrophic cases. Ask me about how far my cushy government job benefits got me when I was hurt off the job. Shit happens. Families should look after each other like back in the day when government was not the nanny to all people.
It's noontime and Joe needs to make a bank deposit so he can pay some bills. Joe's deposit is federally insured by the FDIC because some godless liberal wanted to protect Joe's money from unscrupulous bankers who ruined the banking system before the Great Depression.
The same banking practices that have outed the gouging of consumers in these modern times. The federally funded insurance does protect consumer assets to a certain extent at the cost of every taxpayer. Yet the banks get bailed out, people paid for their losses, and the bankers are again free to find more ways to screw up the economy while fattening their own off shore accounts. How about instead of using taxpayer money to save the day, get to the bottom of how these bankers and fiscal manipulators scam the public and run off with our money.
Joe has to pay his Fannie Mae-underwritten mortgage and his below-market federal student loan because some elitist liberal decided that Joe and the government would be better off if he was educated and earned more money over his lifetime.
Uh, housing crisis? Why is the government underwriting loans to people who cannot afford to or are not secure enough in their lifestyle and fiscal practices to receive these loans? The American way...work hard, pay your bills, save up a down payment, buy a house. Not everyone should be a home owner. It is not a right, it is a privilege. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac failed by offering to subsidise risky home buyers. We all, as taxpayers, share in the cost of bad loans to risky people. Our country is now in the worse housing crisis ever seen by the people of the U.S.A. because of the liberal views that everyone should be equally offered the opportunity to own a home whether they are responsible or not. All of the taxpayers are suffering because of these liberal views.
Joe is home from work. He plans to visit his father this evening at his farm home in the country. He gets in his car for the drive. His car is among the safest in the world because some America-hating liberal fought for car safety standards.
Recalls, did anyone hear the word recall? The safety standards should be met before the cars hit the road. Somebody is not doing their job. What good are standards when not enforced.
He arrives at his boyhood home. His was the third generation to live in the house financed by Farmers' Home Administration because bankers didn't want to make rural loans. The house didn't have electricity until some big-government liberal stuck his nose where it didn't belong and demanded rural electrification.
I'll concede that point to a certain extent. But check back in history when the demands for electrification were being adopted. Conservatives backed it.
He is happy to see his father, who is now retired. His father lives on Social Security and a union pension because some wine-drinking, cheese-eating liberal made sure he could take care of himself so Joe wouldn't have to.
Social Security. A fine idea but one not totally researched. Social Security was meant for a society where the life span of its people was around 60 to 65 years. It was a gamble that most people who paid into the system would be dead before or shortly after they became retirement age. Who would guess that today's 80 would be yesterdays 65. People are far outliving their benefits for over the past three decades. Today's retirees are living on our grand children's benefits. The aging population will never be able to collect what they have paid into the system. Alternate retirement plans should be encouraged (not that anyone could actually live off their social security benefits anyway) This is when being a nanny state is fiscally impossible. People need to plan for their own lives and take charge, or rely on family to help get them by. Generations past took care of their aging, not the government.
Joe gets back in his car for the ride home, and turns on a radio talk show. The radio host keeps saying that liberals are bad and conservatives are good. He doesn't mention that the beloved Republicans have fought against every protection and benefit Joe enjoys throughout his day. Joe agrees: "We don't need those big-government liberals ruining our lives! After all, I'm a self-made man who believes everyone should take care of themselves, just like I have."
True! All have benefited by liberal views but have made us a very needy society of people who cannot stand on our own two feet. Is it too late to change? All the things given to us by the government are at the cost of taxpayers. We are paying a bureaucracy billions to oversee all of our benefits everyday. And the 13 trillion deficit is still rising while a liberal adminsitration continues to spend. Perhaps if we did not have to pay for all of these programs, as taxpayers we would have the money available to stand on our own two feet and use our own charitable instincts to help those need with a hand up (as opposed to hand out). Liberals, Conservatives, Independents all pay for those who do not care if they ever work or not. We pay welfare to able bodied people, subsidize their housing, put the burden of health care to the indigent on our hospitals, which they pass on to us in rising health care costs. We pay unwed mothers who continue to have child after child while on welfare and subsidized housing. Where are their families to teach her to stand up on her own, get a job, raise her own children off the backs of the taxpayers? She is probably the third generation of welfare mothers and has learned the system well. How many drunkards and drug abusers are being housed and fed by the taxpayers? If the Conservatives didn't look out for us fiscally, would the Liberals? Maybe it's time to reach a happy medium and each party give a bit each way. Liberals, we can't support everyone, and everyone is not worthy of our support. Conservatives, know the difference and bend a little to those who are really in need because of circumstances, not laziness. Get the bureaucrats and regulators off the government payroll by reducing social programs. Level the tax paying field, dispose of the two ton tax code and make everyone pay the same 17% across the board with no loopholes and no need for the billions spent on IRS employees and tax enforcement.
Most of all, everyone, help those you chose to help through your own charitable hearts. Take the money out of the middle man's hands and it will help many more people than you will ever know.
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Thursday, January 6, 2011
Our own oil
The following info is all true.
But this is a Democratic Republic, and NOT run by special interests.
What a joke.
Here's an interesting read, important and verifiable information :
About 6 months ago, the writer was watching a news program on oil and
one of the Forbes Bros. was the guest. The host said to Forbes, "I am going to
ask you a direct question and I would like a direct answer; how much oil
does the U.S. have in the ground?" Forbes did not miss a beat, he said, "more
than all the Middle East put together." Please read below.
The U. S. Geological Service issued a report in April 2008 that only
scientists and oil men knew was coming, but man was it big. It was a
revised report (hadn't been updated since 1995) on how much oil was in
this area of the western 2/3 of North Dakota, western South Dakota, and
extreme eastern Montana ...... check THIS out:
http://bakkenshale.net/bakkenshalemap.html
The Bakken is the largest domestic oil discovery since Alaska's Prudhoe
Bay, and has the potential to eliminate all American dependence on foreign
oil. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates it at 503 billion
barrels. Even if just 10% of the oil is recoverable... at $107 a barrel,
we're looking at a resource base worth more than $5..3 trillion.
"When I first briefed legislators on this, you could practically see
their jaws hit the floor. They had no idea.." says Terry Johnson, the Montana
Legislature's financial analyst.
"This sizable find is now the highest-producing onshore oil field found
in the past 56 years," reports The Pittsburgh Post Gazette. It's a
formation known as the Williston Basin, but is more commonly referred to as the
'Bakken..' It stretches from Northern Montana, through North Dakota and
into Canada.. For years, U. S oil exploration has been considered a dead
end.. Even the 'Big Oil' companies gave up searching for major oil wells
decades ago. However, a recent technological breakthrough has opened up
the Bakken's massive reserves... and we now have access of up to 500
billion barrels. And because this is light, sweet oil, those billions of barrels
will cost Americans just $16 PER BARREL!
That's enough crude to fully fuel the American economy for 2041 years
straight. And if THAT didn't throw you on the floor, then this next one
should - because it's from 2006!
U. S. Oil Discovery- Largest Reserve in the World
Stansberry Report Online - 4/20/2006
Hidden 1,000 feet beneath the surface of the Rocky Mountains lies the
largest untapped oil reserve in the world. It is more than 2 TRILLION
barrels. On August 8, 2005 President Bush mandated its extraction. In
three and a half years of high oil prices none has been extracted. With this
motherload of oil why are we still fighting over off-shore drilling?
They reported this stunning news: We have more oil inside our borders,
than all the other proven reserves on earth. Here are the official estimates:
- 8-times as much oil as Saudi Arabia
- 18-times as much oil as Iraq
- 21-times as much oil as Kuwait
- 22-times as much oil as Iran
- 500-times as much oil as Yemen
- and it's all right here in the Western United States .
HOW can this BE? HOW can we NOT BE extracting this? Because the
environmentalists and others have blocked all efforts to help America
become independent of foreign oil! Again, we are letting a small group of
people dictate our lives and our economy.....WHY?
James Bartis, lead researcher with the study says we've got more oil in
this very compact area than the entire Middle East -more than 2 TRILLION
barrels untapped. That's more than all the proven oil reserves of crude oil in
the world today, reports The Denver Post.
Don't think 'OPEC' will drop its price - even with this find? Think
again!
It's all about the competitive marketplace, - it has to. Think OPEC just
might be funding the environmentalists?
--------
By the way...this is all true. Check it out at the link below!!!
GOOGLE it, or follow this link. It will blow your mind.
http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1911
But this is a Democratic Republic, and NOT run by special interests.
What a joke.
Here's an interesting read, important and verifiable information :
About 6 months ago, the writer was watching a news program on oil and
one of the Forbes Bros. was the guest. The host said to Forbes, "I am going to
ask you a direct question and I would like a direct answer; how much oil
does the U.S. have in the ground?" Forbes did not miss a beat, he said, "more
than all the Middle East put together." Please read below.
The U. S. Geological Service issued a report in April 2008 that only
scientists and oil men knew was coming, but man was it big. It was a
revised report (hadn't been updated since 1995) on how much oil was in
this area of the western 2/3 of North Dakota, western South Dakota, and
extreme eastern Montana ...... check THIS out:
http://bakkenshale.net/bakkenshalemap.html
The Bakken is the largest domestic oil discovery since Alaska's Prudhoe
Bay, and has the potential to eliminate all American dependence on foreign
oil. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates it at 503 billion
barrels. Even if just 10% of the oil is recoverable... at $107 a barrel,
we're looking at a resource base worth more than $5..3 trillion.
"When I first briefed legislators on this, you could practically see
their jaws hit the floor. They had no idea.." says Terry Johnson, the Montana
Legislature's financial analyst.
"This sizable find is now the highest-producing onshore oil field found
in the past 56 years," reports The Pittsburgh Post Gazette. It's a
formation known as the Williston Basin, but is more commonly referred to as the
'Bakken..' It stretches from Northern Montana, through North Dakota and
into Canada.. For years, U. S oil exploration has been considered a dead
end.. Even the 'Big Oil' companies gave up searching for major oil wells
decades ago. However, a recent technological breakthrough has opened up
the Bakken's massive reserves... and we now have access of up to 500
billion barrels. And because this is light, sweet oil, those billions of barrels
will cost Americans just $16 PER BARREL!
That's enough crude to fully fuel the American economy for 2041 years
straight. And if THAT didn't throw you on the floor, then this next one
should - because it's from 2006!
U. S. Oil Discovery- Largest Reserve in the World
Stansberry Report Online - 4/20/2006
Hidden 1,000 feet beneath the surface of the Rocky Mountains lies the
largest untapped oil reserve in the world. It is more than 2 TRILLION
barrels. On August 8, 2005 President Bush mandated its extraction. In
three and a half years of high oil prices none has been extracted. With this
motherload of oil why are we still fighting over off-shore drilling?
They reported this stunning news: We have more oil inside our borders,
than all the other proven reserves on earth. Here are the official estimates:
- 8-times as much oil as Saudi Arabia
- 18-times as much oil as Iraq
- 21-times as much oil as Kuwait
- 22-times as much oil as Iran
- 500-times as much oil as Yemen
- and it's all right here in the Western United States .
HOW can this BE? HOW can we NOT BE extracting this? Because the
environmentalists and others have blocked all efforts to help America
become independent of foreign oil! Again, we are letting a small group of
people dictate our lives and our economy.....WHY?
James Bartis, lead researcher with the study says we've got more oil in
this very compact area than the entire Middle East -more than 2 TRILLION
barrels untapped. That's more than all the proven oil reserves of crude oil in
the world today, reports The Denver Post.
Don't think 'OPEC' will drop its price - even with this find? Think
again!
It's all about the competitive marketplace, - it has to. Think OPEC just
might be funding the environmentalists?
--------
By the way...this is all true. Check it out at the link below!!!
GOOGLE it, or follow this link. It will blow your mind.
http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1911
Saturday, January 1, 2011
Endangering America from the White House
CIA book review
As President George W. Bush's top speechwriter, Marc Thiessen was provided unique access to the CIA program used in interrogating top Al Qaeda terrorists, including the mastermind of the 9/11 attack, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad (KSM).
Now, his riveting new book, "Courting Disaster", How the CIA Kept America Safe (Regnery), has been published.
Here is an excerpt from "Courting Disaster":
Just before dawn on March 1, 2003, two dozen heavily armed Pakistani tactical assault forces move in and surround a safe house in Rawalpindi .. A few hours earlier they had received a text message from an informant inside the house. It read: "I am with KSM."
Bursting in, they find the disheveled mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, in his bedroom. He is taken into custody. In the safe house, they find a treasure trove of computers, documents, cell phones and other valuable "pocket litter."
Once in custody, KSM is defiant. He refuses to answer questions, informing his captors that he will tell them everything when he gets to America and sees his lawyer. But KSM is not taken to America to see a lawyer Instead he is taken to a secret CIA "black site" in an undisclosed location.
Upon arrival, KSM finds himself in the complete control of Americans. He does not know where he is, how long he will be there, or what his fate will be.
Despite his circumstances, KSM still refuses to talk. He spews contempt at his interrogators, telling them Americans are weak, lack resilience, and are unable to do what is necessary to prevent the terrorists from succeeding in their goals. He has trained to resist interrogation. When he is asked for information about future attacks, he tells his questioners scornfully: "Soon, you will know."
It becomes clear he will not reveal the information using traditional interrogation techniques. So he undergoes a series of "enhanced interrogation techniques" approved for use only on the most high-value detainees. The techniques include waterboarding.
His resistance is described by one senior American official as "superhuman." Eventually, however, the techniques work, and KSM becomes cooperative-for reasons that will be described later in this book.
He begins telling his CIA de-briefers about active al Qaeda plots to launch attacks against the United States and other Western targets. He holds classes for CIA officials, using a chalkboard to draw a picture of al Qaeda's operating structure, financing, communications, and logistics. He identifies al Qaeda travel routes and safe havens, and helps intelligence officers make sense of documents and computer records seized in terroristraids. He identifies voices in intercepted telephone calls, and helps officials understand the meaning of coded terrorist communications. He provides information that helps our intelligence community capture other high-ranking terrorists, KSM's questioning, and that of other captured terrorists, produces more than 6,000 intelligence reports, which are shared across the intelligence community, as well as with our allies across the world.
In one of these reports, KSM describes in detail the revisions he made to his failed 1994-1995 plan known as the "Bojinka plot" to blow up a dozen airplanes carrying some 4,000 passengers over the Pacific Ocean.
Years later, an observant CIA officer notices the activities of a cell being followed by British authorities appear to match KSM's description of his plans for a Bojinka-style attack.
In an operation that involves unprecedented intelligence cooperation between our countries, British officials proceed to unravel the plot.
On the night of Aug.9, 2006 they launch a series of raids in a northeast London suburb that lead to the arrest of two dozen al Qaeda terrorist suspects. They find A USB thumb-drive in the pocket of one of the men
with security details for Heathrow airport, and information on seven trans-Atlantic flights that were scheduled to take off within hours of each other:
* United Airlines Flight 931 to San Francisco departing at 2:15 p.m.;
* Air Canada Flight 849 to Toronto departing at 3:00 p.m.;
* Air Canada Flight 865 to Montreal departing at 3:15 p.m.;
* United Airlines Flight 959 to Chicago departing at 3:40 p.m.;
* United Airlines Flight 925 to Washington departing at 4:20 p.m.;
* American Airlines Flight 131 to New York departing at 4:35 p.m;
* American Airlines Flight 91 to Chicago departing at 4:50 p.m.
They seize bomb-making equipment and hydrogen peroxide to make liquid explosives. And they find the chilling martyrdom videos the suicide bombers had prepared.
Today, if you asked an average person on the street what they know
about the 2006 airlines plot, most would not be able to tell you much.
Few Americans are aware of the fact al Qaeda had planned to mark
the fifth anniversary of 9/11 with an attack of similar scope and magnitude.
And still fewer realize the terrorists' true intentions in this plot were uncovered thanks to critical information obtained through the
interrogation of the man who conceived it: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
This is only one of the many attacks stopped with the help of the CIA interrogation program established by the Bush Administration in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Editor's Note: For other foiled terrorist plots, see page 9 of "Courting Disaster."
In addition to helping break up these specific terrorist cells and
plots, CIA questioning provided our intelligence community with an
unparalleled body of information about al Qaeda Until the program was temporarily suspended in 2006, intelligence officials say, well over half of the information our government had about al Qaeda-how it operates, how it moves money, how it communicates, how it recruits operatives, how it picks targets, how it plans and carries out attacks-came from the interrogation of terrorists in CIA custody.
Former CIA Director George Tenet has declared: "I know this program has saved lives. I know we've disrupted plots. I know this program alone is worth more than what the FBI, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the National Security Agency put together have been able to tell us."
Former CIA Director Mike Hayden has said: "The facts of the case are that the use of these techniques against these terrorists made us safer. It really did work."
Even Barack Obama's Director of National Intelligence, Dennis Blair, has acknowledged: "High-value information came from interrogations in which those methods were used and provided a deeper understanding of the al Qaeda organization that was attacking this country."
Leon Panetta, Obama's CIA Director, has said: "Important information was gathered from these detainees. It provided information that was acted upon."
And John Brennan, Obama's Homeland Security Advisor, when asked in an interview if enhanced-interrogation techniques were necessary to keep America safe, replied : "Would the U.S. be handicapped if the CIA was not, in fact, able to carry out these types of detention and debriefing activities? I would say yes."
On Jan. 22, 2009, President Obama issued Executive Order 13491, closing the CIA program and directing that, henceforth, all interrogations by U.S personnel must follow the techniques contained in the Army Field Manual.
The morning of the announcement, Mike Hayden was still in his post as CIA Director, He called White House Counsel Greg Craig and told him bluntly: "You didn't ask, but this is the CIA officially nonconcurring". The president went ahead anyway, over ruling the objections of the agency.
A few months later, on April 16, 2009, President Obama ordered the release of four Justice Department memos that described in detail the techniques used to interrogate KSM and other high-value terrorists. This time, not just Hayden (who was now retired) but five CIA directors -including Obama's own director, Leon Panetta -- objected.
George Tenet called to urge against the memos' release. So did Porter Goss. So did John eutch. Hayden says: "You had CIA directors in a continuous unbroken stream to 1995 calling saying, 'Don't do this.'"
In addition to objections from the men who led the agency for a collective 14 years, the President also heard objections from the agency's covert field operatives. A few weeks earlier, Panetta had arranged for the eight top officials of the Clandestine Service to meet with the President. It was highly unusual for these clandestine officers to visit the Oval Office, and they used the opportunity to warn the President that releasing the memos would put agency operatives at risk. The President reportedly listened respectfully-and then ignored their advice.
With these actions, Barack Obama arguably did more damage to America's national security in his first 100 days of office than any President in American history.
As President George W. Bush's top speechwriter, Marc Thiessen was provided unique access to the CIA program used in interrogating top Al Qaeda terrorists, including the mastermind of the 9/11 attack, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad (KSM).
Now, his riveting new book, "Courting Disaster", How the CIA Kept America Safe (Regnery), has been published.
Here is an excerpt from "Courting Disaster":
Just before dawn on March 1, 2003, two dozen heavily armed Pakistani tactical assault forces move in and surround a safe house in Rawalpindi .. A few hours earlier they had received a text message from an informant inside the house. It read: "I am with KSM."
Bursting in, they find the disheveled mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, in his bedroom. He is taken into custody. In the safe house, they find a treasure trove of computers, documents, cell phones and other valuable "pocket litter."
Once in custody, KSM is defiant. He refuses to answer questions, informing his captors that he will tell them everything when he gets to America and sees his lawyer. But KSM is not taken to America to see a lawyer Instead he is taken to a secret CIA "black site" in an undisclosed location.
Upon arrival, KSM finds himself in the complete control of Americans. He does not know where he is, how long he will be there, or what his fate will be.
Despite his circumstances, KSM still refuses to talk. He spews contempt at his interrogators, telling them Americans are weak, lack resilience, and are unable to do what is necessary to prevent the terrorists from succeeding in their goals. He has trained to resist interrogation. When he is asked for information about future attacks, he tells his questioners scornfully: "Soon, you will know."
It becomes clear he will not reveal the information using traditional interrogation techniques. So he undergoes a series of "enhanced interrogation techniques" approved for use only on the most high-value detainees. The techniques include waterboarding.
His resistance is described by one senior American official as "superhuman." Eventually, however, the techniques work, and KSM becomes cooperative-for reasons that will be described later in this book.
He begins telling his CIA de-briefers about active al Qaeda plots to launch attacks against the United States and other Western targets. He holds classes for CIA officials, using a chalkboard to draw a picture of al Qaeda's operating structure, financing, communications, and logistics. He identifies al Qaeda travel routes and safe havens, and helps intelligence officers make sense of documents and computer records seized in terroristraids. He identifies voices in intercepted telephone calls, and helps officials understand the meaning of coded terrorist communications. He provides information that helps our intelligence community capture other high-ranking terrorists, KSM's questioning, and that of other captured terrorists, produces more than 6,000 intelligence reports, which are shared across the intelligence community, as well as with our allies across the world.
In one of these reports, KSM describes in detail the revisions he made to his failed 1994-1995 plan known as the "Bojinka plot" to blow up a dozen airplanes carrying some 4,000 passengers over the Pacific Ocean.
Years later, an observant CIA officer notices the activities of a cell being followed by British authorities appear to match KSM's description of his plans for a Bojinka-style attack.
In an operation that involves unprecedented intelligence cooperation between our countries, British officials proceed to unravel the plot.
On the night of Aug.9, 2006 they launch a series of raids in a northeast London suburb that lead to the arrest of two dozen al Qaeda terrorist suspects. They find A USB thumb-drive in the pocket of one of the men
with security details for Heathrow airport, and information on seven trans-Atlantic flights that were scheduled to take off within hours of each other:
* United Airlines Flight 931 to San Francisco departing at 2:15 p.m.;
* Air Canada Flight 849 to Toronto departing at 3:00 p.m.;
* Air Canada Flight 865 to Montreal departing at 3:15 p.m.;
* United Airlines Flight 959 to Chicago departing at 3:40 p.m.;
* United Airlines Flight 925 to Washington departing at 4:20 p.m.;
* American Airlines Flight 131 to New York departing at 4:35 p.m;
* American Airlines Flight 91 to Chicago departing at 4:50 p.m.
They seize bomb-making equipment and hydrogen peroxide to make liquid explosives. And they find the chilling martyrdom videos the suicide bombers had prepared.
Today, if you asked an average person on the street what they know
about the 2006 airlines plot, most would not be able to tell you much.
Few Americans are aware of the fact al Qaeda had planned to mark
the fifth anniversary of 9/11 with an attack of similar scope and magnitude.
And still fewer realize the terrorists' true intentions in this plot were uncovered thanks to critical information obtained through the
interrogation of the man who conceived it: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
This is only one of the many attacks stopped with the help of the CIA interrogation program established by the Bush Administration in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Editor's Note: For other foiled terrorist plots, see page 9 of "Courting Disaster."
In addition to helping break up these specific terrorist cells and
plots, CIA questioning provided our intelligence community with an
unparalleled body of information about al Qaeda Until the program was temporarily suspended in 2006, intelligence officials say, well over half of the information our government had about al Qaeda-how it operates, how it moves money, how it communicates, how it recruits operatives, how it picks targets, how it plans and carries out attacks-came from the interrogation of terrorists in CIA custody.
Former CIA Director George Tenet has declared: "I know this program has saved lives. I know we've disrupted plots. I know this program alone is worth more than what the FBI, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the National Security Agency put together have been able to tell us."
Former CIA Director Mike Hayden has said: "The facts of the case are that the use of these techniques against these terrorists made us safer. It really did work."
Even Barack Obama's Director of National Intelligence, Dennis Blair, has acknowledged: "High-value information came from interrogations in which those methods were used and provided a deeper understanding of the al Qaeda organization that was attacking this country."
Leon Panetta, Obama's CIA Director, has said: "Important information was gathered from these detainees. It provided information that was acted upon."
And John Brennan, Obama's Homeland Security Advisor, when asked in an interview if enhanced-interrogation techniques were necessary to keep America safe, replied : "Would the U.S. be handicapped if the CIA was not, in fact, able to carry out these types of detention and debriefing activities? I would say yes."
On Jan. 22, 2009, President Obama issued Executive Order 13491, closing the CIA program and directing that, henceforth, all interrogations by U.S personnel must follow the techniques contained in the Army Field Manual.
The morning of the announcement, Mike Hayden was still in his post as CIA Director, He called White House Counsel Greg Craig and told him bluntly: "You didn't ask, but this is the CIA officially nonconcurring". The president went ahead anyway, over ruling the objections of the agency.
A few months later, on April 16, 2009, President Obama ordered the release of four Justice Department memos that described in detail the techniques used to interrogate KSM and other high-value terrorists. This time, not just Hayden (who was now retired) but five CIA directors -including Obama's own director, Leon Panetta -- objected.
George Tenet called to urge against the memos' release. So did Porter Goss. So did John eutch. Hayden says: "You had CIA directors in a continuous unbroken stream to 1995 calling saying, 'Don't do this.'"
In addition to objections from the men who led the agency for a collective 14 years, the President also heard objections from the agency's covert field operatives. A few weeks earlier, Panetta had arranged for the eight top officials of the Clandestine Service to meet with the President. It was highly unusual for these clandestine officers to visit the Oval Office, and they used the opportunity to warn the President that releasing the memos would put agency operatives at risk. The President reportedly listened respectfully-and then ignored their advice.
With these actions, Barack Obama arguably did more damage to America's national security in his first 100 days of office than any President in American history.
Friday, October 22, 2010
Bigotry?
Far and above being politically correct, we must first be honest. The divide is not going to be narrowed until people face their fears and prejudice. Fear is an important human nature. Sometimes it is let go to a point where the object of the fear becomes such a focal point in the lives of people, the world becomes divided in the contradiction of what they know is right and how they actually feel.
In the wake of the firing of Juan Williams, I have looked inside myself to try to analyze the fears I have and search my heart for validity. It is human nature to react to fear and be anxious when put in positions which they are vulnerable.
I do not consider myself a bigot. I have always had love and respect for all races and creeds. But there are situations where a certain time of place injects fear and anxiety. Unfortuntely those times and places sometimes are inhabitied by people of a race or religion not my own. That does not make me a bigot if I feel aprehensive.
Like Juan Williams stated, when he boards a planeand is confronted by passengers in Muslim garb, it triggers memories of one of the most heinous crimes on humanity to ever exist on our own soil. At a party, a gathering, or on the street one may not think twice about a Muslim in their presence. The same goes for for entering the domain of certain races and nationalities known for gang wars and crime. When one walks through such a neighborhood, he fears that he might be mugged, or God forbid, killed.
The neighborhood can be inhabited by blacks, whites, Chinese, Hispanics, Muslims, ad/or whites. The fear is not based on the people themselves, but the location and history the place presents. Murderous people and violent criminals come from within all races and creeds. In certain places known to be inhabited by the likes of skinheads, black panther radicals, Muslim extremists, KKK, ethnic gangs, etc, it is not strange to feel afraid. It does not call for the label of bigotry when one honestly states he suffers fear and anxiety in such places.
A black man may feel more anxious in an area where there once was a history of violence at the hand of white radicals and KKK, even though it had not happened for quite some time. Airports trigger the fear of hijackers and terrorists, and the sight of a group of Muslims may exhasubate that fear. A sweating, obviously nervous white man typical of the characters portraying hijackers in movies will also raise the hairs of angst in any normal person. A Russian speaking businessman clutching a breifcase can cause people to be uneasy from memories of the cold war and media portrayal of them as killer spies. Even though one has not experienced directly the riots and life in "the hood" where gang members flourish, movies and television keep reminding us that it exists. Would you not feel threatened at the sight of Hispanic, White, or Chinese people in gang GARB as you proceed down the streets known as their turf?
Fear is a human emotion. There are people in our lives who may at one time or another trigger this fear. It does not automatically mean the fearful are bigots. The real bigots are the gangs and radicals who induce fear.
Marian Beatty
In the wake of the firing of Juan Williams, I have looked inside myself to try to analyze the fears I have and search my heart for validity. It is human nature to react to fear and be anxious when put in positions which they are vulnerable.
I do not consider myself a bigot. I have always had love and respect for all races and creeds. But there are situations where a certain time of place injects fear and anxiety. Unfortuntely those times and places sometimes are inhabitied by people of a race or religion not my own. That does not make me a bigot if I feel aprehensive.
Like Juan Williams stated, when he boards a planeand is confronted by passengers in Muslim garb, it triggers memories of one of the most heinous crimes on humanity to ever exist on our own soil. At a party, a gathering, or on the street one may not think twice about a Muslim in their presence. The same goes for for entering the domain of certain races and nationalities known for gang wars and crime. When one walks through such a neighborhood, he fears that he might be mugged, or God forbid, killed.
The neighborhood can be inhabited by blacks, whites, Chinese, Hispanics, Muslims, ad/or whites. The fear is not based on the people themselves, but the location and history the place presents. Murderous people and violent criminals come from within all races and creeds. In certain places known to be inhabited by the likes of skinheads, black panther radicals, Muslim extremists, KKK, ethnic gangs, etc, it is not strange to feel afraid. It does not call for the label of bigotry when one honestly states he suffers fear and anxiety in such places.
A black man may feel more anxious in an area where there once was a history of violence at the hand of white radicals and KKK, even though it had not happened for quite some time. Airports trigger the fear of hijackers and terrorists, and the sight of a group of Muslims may exhasubate that fear. A sweating, obviously nervous white man typical of the characters portraying hijackers in movies will also raise the hairs of angst in any normal person. A Russian speaking businessman clutching a breifcase can cause people to be uneasy from memories of the cold war and media portrayal of them as killer spies. Even though one has not experienced directly the riots and life in "the hood" where gang members flourish, movies and television keep reminding us that it exists. Would you not feel threatened at the sight of Hispanic, White, or Chinese people in gang GARB as you proceed down the streets known as their turf?
Fear is a human emotion. There are people in our lives who may at one time or another trigger this fear. It does not automatically mean the fearful are bigots. The real bigots are the gangs and radicals who induce fear.
Marian Beatty
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Juan Williams
I sit hear seething about the injustice done to Juan Williams. He was one Liberal who's statements I had no problem mulling around my mind. Bless Fox News for standing behind him...he has already received an extended contract from them for an expanded role in their organization. Shame on NPR for firing Juan, it mysteriously coincides with an over one million dollar "donation" to NPR by George Soros. I call for all public funding and our tax dollars to be withdrawn from funding NPR now and in the future. If George Soros intends to fund them and have a say in what free speech can and cannot be expressed by NPR employees, let him. It should no longer be considerd a publicly funded voice.
This only goes to prove that the far left Marxist and Socialist Democrats are far more dangerous than their own party realizes. They have powerful people (George Soros comes to mind) funding the agenda to fundamentally transform America to an all powerful government and nanny state.
They continue to tell you they are spreading the wealth and giving a leg up to lower class citizens so that our country will become a more middle class society. They want to limit the wealth of the entrepreneurs who have provided the jobs for the nation all these years. They want the government to control all aspects of society from health to wealth, energy to manufacturing, food to farming. Then only the government will be the elite class and they will regulate their country for the benefit of themselves and not the people.
Juan Williams, one of the few voices left of the moderate liberal society is just one of many being scarified and shunned by the new far left Democrats. I can see in the political mail I receive that most Democratic candidates are not including the fact they are Democrats on their political mail. Sometimes if you look closely you can see in very tiny print that the ad was funded by the Democratic Party, but most times, they do not include the affiliation.
Republicans almost blew it with the George Bush Progressive agenda and are now waking up to find that The People do not want either far left or far right politicians in charge of this Republic. Both sides are throwing stones at the Tea Party for their attempt to bring back our founding principles. The smart Republicans and Democrats are moving more center and that will be what saves our Republic.
I will not stand up for the Anarchy of the right or the Socialism of the left. I will continue to stand by those Patriots who understand and live by our Constitution.
Juan Williams, you are a Patriot, sir!
Unless your heart, your soul, and your whole being are behind every decision you make, the words from your mouth will be empty and each action will be meaningless. (UNKNOWN)
Action
Coming from the mouths of dissenters
Not understanding the facts
Come deplorable denigrations
And remarkable negative acts
Shout only with you voice
If it comes right from your heart
Don't act with hostile hands
Unless your soul is truly a part
Stand with true believers
Not with crowds who riot for naught
And know that your decisions
Come from facts sincerely sought
Marian
October 21, 2010
This only goes to prove that the far left Marxist and Socialist Democrats are far more dangerous than their own party realizes. They have powerful people (George Soros comes to mind) funding the agenda to fundamentally transform America to an all powerful government and nanny state.
They continue to tell you they are spreading the wealth and giving a leg up to lower class citizens so that our country will become a more middle class society. They want to limit the wealth of the entrepreneurs who have provided the jobs for the nation all these years. They want the government to control all aspects of society from health to wealth, energy to manufacturing, food to farming. Then only the government will be the elite class and they will regulate their country for the benefit of themselves and not the people.
Juan Williams, one of the few voices left of the moderate liberal society is just one of many being scarified and shunned by the new far left Democrats. I can see in the political mail I receive that most Democratic candidates are not including the fact they are Democrats on their political mail. Sometimes if you look closely you can see in very tiny print that the ad was funded by the Democratic Party, but most times, they do not include the affiliation.
Republicans almost blew it with the George Bush Progressive agenda and are now waking up to find that The People do not want either far left or far right politicians in charge of this Republic. Both sides are throwing stones at the Tea Party for their attempt to bring back our founding principles. The smart Republicans and Democrats are moving more center and that will be what saves our Republic.
I will not stand up for the Anarchy of the right or the Socialism of the left. I will continue to stand by those Patriots who understand and live by our Constitution.
Juan Williams, you are a Patriot, sir!
Unless your heart, your soul, and your whole being are behind every decision you make, the words from your mouth will be empty and each action will be meaningless. (UNKNOWN)
Action
Coming from the mouths of dissenters
Not understanding the facts
Come deplorable denigrations
And remarkable negative acts
Shout only with you voice
If it comes right from your heart
Don't act with hostile hands
Unless your soul is truly a part
Stand with true believers
Not with crowds who riot for naught
And know that your decisions
Come from facts sincerely sought
Marian
October 21, 2010
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Implications of E-10
I was always taught about the good intentions and the wonderful writings of certain writers like H.G. Wells and George Bernard Shaw. Most of what we learn comes from the media in one form or another. In my research I have found that over the years history has been rewritten, subverted, twisted, and generally has been used as a tool for subtle indoctrination of young minds. The fact is that through the information process governments and nations around the world wield control as to what their citizens believe, value, and do. The people believe generally what the media tells them to believe and as for the petty little world of journalism, the media demonstrates how it is careful to traffic only authorized ideas and opinions while it gives the impression of the presentation of free ideas and opinions. The reality is that it serves like jesters in a tyrants court.
Let's not stop with the media. Education, or what passes for education in our schools, is the biggest propaganda machine of all. Ideology fed to our children little by little in an orchestrated subtle way to form and mold an entire population of sheep, taught only to have faith and dependence on a government as their ultimate savior in all things. It's all about control.
Back in June I covered the Fabian Socialist and I see that yesterday Glenn Beck is getting around to it now. This of course is a British thing that gave birth to all kinds of secret crap around the world. The Fabians proved how easy it is to manipulate and control the people. That's only a fraction of what we have going on and has gone in the states. Tomorrow I will get into the E-10. It was a top secret group of ten men who could take over the USA completely at the whim of the president. At the time these ten men under Gordon Gray who was the director of the OFFICE OF EMERGENCY RESOURCES...now who ever heard of that? Then comes the OFFICE OF DEFENSE MOBILIZATION...both of which have grown over the years into what we now know as FEMA and HOMELAND SECURITY of which we are only aware of the surface activities.
Part of the original E-10 was Theodore Koop VP CBS which is the emergency censorship division, also Frank Stanton president of CBS who heads the emergency communications agency...(ever hear of that) Then there's Dr. George Pierce Baker of the Harvard Business School, in charge of emergency transport..."TRANSPORT"...More tomorrow, now to wonder why the media only reports what they want us to hear..THEY ARE THE GOVERNMENT on the shadow side.
Implications E-10 Part 2
You may see on rare times a newscaster mention something casually about big government. It seems that if they want to keep their jobs they keep their careers afloat by learning the fine art of evasion. They have skillfully learned how to dance around the important parts of the story and thus with much finesse they say a whole lot about nothing. DARE NOT OFFEND THOSE WHO WIELD POLITICO-ECONOMIC POWER! In keeping with the liberal agenda the media never asks why things happen as they do. Social problems are rarely associated with the politico-economic forces that create them. Imagine being critical of those who have such CONTROL over you and your business? Dare not report or cross that imaginary line! The media downplays stories of momentous magnitude or it isn't reported at all. Why is not the size of government, all it's secret agencies, the subversion of our educational systems, and the lies concerning our financial systems never seem to come to light via our media? Is it because of the fact that the government is now the media and they toss a few things our way to avoid drawing even more suspicion to themselves?
The press is a great keyboard on which the government can play "(Joesph Goebbels) Nazi propaganda minister for Hitler.
The simplest method of securing a silent weapon and gaining control of the public is to keep the public undisciplined and ignorant of the basic SYSTEM PRINCIPLES on the one hand, while keeping them confused, disorganized, and DISTRACTED with matters of no real importance on the other hand. This is achieved by :1.) disengaging their minds; sabotaging their mental activities; providing a low-quality program of public education in mathematics, logic, systems design and economics; discouraging technical creativity. 2) Engaging their emotions, increasing their self-indulgence in emotional and physical activities, by: a) unrelenting emotional afforestation's and attacks (mental and emotional rape) by way of constant barrage of sex, violence, and wars in the media-especially the TV and newspapers. b) giving them what they desire...in excess..."junk food for thought"...and depriving them of what they really need. Keep up maximum diversion and the people won't see, keep the crap out front so that there is no outlet for the truth and now that the people are boxed in these multiple agencies can continue to grow without notice.
"Media manipulation in the U.S. today is more efficient than it was in Nazi Germany, because here we have the pretense that we are getting all the information we want. That misconception prevents people from even looking for the truth." Mark Crispin Miller
Over the last six decades the government have positioned themselves to OVERTHROW THE PEOPLE...sounds crazy...radical! Research on your own, in detail...TRANSITION TO OLIGARCHY...That will be it for today.
Part 3 Implications of the expanded E-10
With each expansion of government activity it has always been under the disguise of benefiting the people, of protecting the people, and has always been presented to the people as one of the benefits of a free society. This of course is my opinion, it is the greatest of all lies. Never anywhere in the history of the world has a government ever had the Noble intention as motivation of existing exclusively for the benefit of it's citizens. It is nearly impossible to see the truth as the government takes from the evil rich and gives it to those who are less motivated.
"Under socialism, you would not be allowed to be poor. You will be forcibly fed, clothed,lodged, taught, and employed whether you like it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all the trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner, but whilst you are permitted to live, you will have to live well." George Bernard Shaw.
So now back to the expansion of government. In order to carry out this expansion complete control is essential. Control of the media, the financial institutions, the military, and all other necessary functions that ALLOW the people to exist. Once the government is expanded, and it usually happens literally un-noticed then complete control becomes possible to advance toward total world governance. This I see as the general course of things...this of course explains why in recent months our government has grown by one third and continues to grow...it's the march to the new world order.
Do I sound insane? Join me tomorrow when I continue with my investigation into the UN and the elements of the new world order, THE ROUND TABLE GROUP, ROTHSCHILD AND THE ILLUMINATI, AND THE CFR...You may want to check these out...they are a part of the master plan. (Remember that fear makes the wolf bigger than he is)
Let's not stop with the media. Education, or what passes for education in our schools, is the biggest propaganda machine of all. Ideology fed to our children little by little in an orchestrated subtle way to form and mold an entire population of sheep, taught only to have faith and dependence on a government as their ultimate savior in all things. It's all about control.
Back in June I covered the Fabian Socialist and I see that yesterday Glenn Beck is getting around to it now. This of course is a British thing that gave birth to all kinds of secret crap around the world. The Fabians proved how easy it is to manipulate and control the people. That's only a fraction of what we have going on and has gone in the states. Tomorrow I will get into the E-10. It was a top secret group of ten men who could take over the USA completely at the whim of the president. At the time these ten men under Gordon Gray who was the director of the OFFICE OF EMERGENCY RESOURCES...now who ever heard of that? Then comes the OFFICE OF DEFENSE MOBILIZATION...both of which have grown over the years into what we now know as FEMA and HOMELAND SECURITY of which we are only aware of the surface activities.
Part of the original E-10 was Theodore Koop VP CBS which is the emergency censorship division, also Frank Stanton president of CBS who heads the emergency communications agency...(ever hear of that) Then there's Dr. George Pierce Baker of the Harvard Business School, in charge of emergency transport..."TRANSPORT"...More tomorrow, now to wonder why the media only reports what they want us to hear..THEY ARE THE GOVERNMENT on the shadow side.
Implications E-10 Part 2
You may see on rare times a newscaster mention something casually about big government. It seems that if they want to keep their jobs they keep their careers afloat by learning the fine art of evasion. They have skillfully learned how to dance around the important parts of the story and thus with much finesse they say a whole lot about nothing. DARE NOT OFFEND THOSE WHO WIELD POLITICO-ECONOMIC POWER! In keeping with the liberal agenda the media never asks why things happen as they do. Social problems are rarely associated with the politico-economic forces that create them. Imagine being critical of those who have such CONTROL over you and your business? Dare not report or cross that imaginary line! The media downplays stories of momentous magnitude or it isn't reported at all. Why is not the size of government, all it's secret agencies, the subversion of our educational systems, and the lies concerning our financial systems never seem to come to light via our media? Is it because of the fact that the government is now the media and they toss a few things our way to avoid drawing even more suspicion to themselves?
The press is a great keyboard on which the government can play "(Joesph Goebbels) Nazi propaganda minister for Hitler.
The simplest method of securing a silent weapon and gaining control of the public is to keep the public undisciplined and ignorant of the basic SYSTEM PRINCIPLES on the one hand, while keeping them confused, disorganized, and DISTRACTED with matters of no real importance on the other hand. This is achieved by :1.) disengaging their minds; sabotaging their mental activities; providing a low-quality program of public education in mathematics, logic, systems design and economics; discouraging technical creativity. 2) Engaging their emotions, increasing their self-indulgence in emotional and physical activities, by: a) unrelenting emotional afforestation's and attacks (mental and emotional rape) by way of constant barrage of sex, violence, and wars in the media-especially the TV and newspapers. b) giving them what they desire...in excess..."junk food for thought"...and depriving them of what they really need. Keep up maximum diversion and the people won't see, keep the crap out front so that there is no outlet for the truth and now that the people are boxed in these multiple agencies can continue to grow without notice.
"Media manipulation in the U.S. today is more efficient than it was in Nazi Germany, because here we have the pretense that we are getting all the information we want. That misconception prevents people from even looking for the truth." Mark Crispin Miller
Over the last six decades the government have positioned themselves to OVERTHROW THE PEOPLE...sounds crazy...radical! Research on your own, in detail...TRANSITION TO OLIGARCHY...That will be it for today.
Part 3 Implications of the expanded E-10
With each expansion of government activity it has always been under the disguise of benefiting the people, of protecting the people, and has always been presented to the people as one of the benefits of a free society. This of course is my opinion, it is the greatest of all lies. Never anywhere in the history of the world has a government ever had the Noble intention as motivation of existing exclusively for the benefit of it's citizens. It is nearly impossible to see the truth as the government takes from the evil rich and gives it to those who are less motivated.
"Under socialism, you would not be allowed to be poor. You will be forcibly fed, clothed,lodged, taught, and employed whether you like it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all the trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner, but whilst you are permitted to live, you will have to live well." George Bernard Shaw.
So now back to the expansion of government. In order to carry out this expansion complete control is essential. Control of the media, the financial institutions, the military, and all other necessary functions that ALLOW the people to exist. Once the government is expanded, and it usually happens literally un-noticed then complete control becomes possible to advance toward total world governance. This I see as the general course of things...this of course explains why in recent months our government has grown by one third and continues to grow...it's the march to the new world order.
Do I sound insane? Join me tomorrow when I continue with my investigation into the UN and the elements of the new world order, THE ROUND TABLE GROUP, ROTHSCHILD AND THE ILLUMINATI, AND THE CFR...You may want to check these out...they are a part of the master plan. (Remember that fear makes the wolf bigger than he is)
Oligarchy and what is it?
Oligarchy and what is it?
Oligarchy is a Greek word meaning to rule, govern, to command. It's a type of government that has evolved from purer forms of government...even from free democracies. History shows that once a government evolves into oligarcy they are tyrannical and are reliant on public servitude in order to exist. A well knownfictional oligarchy is represented in the book 1984 by George Orwell.
Robert Michels (a German socialologist) that any political system eventually evolves into oligarchy. He went on to say that modern democracies should be considered as oligarchies. In these systems actual differences between viable political rivals are small, the oligarchic elite impose strict limits on what constitutes an acceptable and respectable political position, and politicians careers DEPEND heavily on UNELECTED AND MEDIA ELITES. (Note prior discussion on CZARS and the mainstream media) Thus comes the popular phrase that there is only one political party...THE INCUMBANT PARTY!
Let me ask you this...does this sound familiar?...Corporate oligarcy is a form of POWER, governmental or operational, WHERE SUCH POWER effectively rest with a small elite group of INSIDE INDIVIDUALS, educational institutions, commercial entities such as banks, or large corporations (GE) that act in complicity with or at the whim of the oligarchy, OFTEN WITH NO REGARD FOR CONSTITUTIONALY PROTECTED PREOGATIVE. oTHER LARGE CORPORATIONS ARE TAKEN OVER BY THE GOVERNMENT OR BY THE LEAST REGULATED TO THE POINT THAT THEY CAN'T TAKE A CRAP WITHOUT GOVERNMENT APPROVAL.
We started on the road to Oligarcy in 1913 when ammendments to our orignal constitution opened the door for more government control...those who think that the constitution should be an absolute should examine the ammendments which changed the complection of the original document. We need to know what we're talking about when we shout from the mountain tops...DO NOT DEVIATE FROM THE CONSTITUTION! From the basic concept and the original document we should follow to the letter, but a door was opened to complete oilgarchy with the 16th ammendment (Starts collllateralization of American prosperity Feb 1913) The 17th ammendment effectively removes states from any role/check on Federal authority...which means no other law can serve to exceed a federal law or mandate (ARIZONA TODAY) and now comes the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT...which takes monotary matters out of the hands of the people and into the hands of the bankers and the world banks such as the IMF and of course out of the scrutiny and accountability to even our own congress.
Since 1913 our country regardless of party continues to change, little by little, dose by dose. In 1971 just about everything was in place for our government to be considered an oligarchy...Study up on the 16th ammendment, 17th ammendment, and the federal reserve act of 1913...This of course will give you a better understanding as to how we as a country have legislated ourseves right to where we are right now. Some say it's the excesses of the people...I say it's the excesses of government getting bigger and bigger. The next phase of our evolution is pure socialism, then comes communism, then total collapse...There is a solution, and I will go into that at a later date.
Oligarchy is a Greek word meaning to rule, govern, to command. It's a type of government that has evolved from purer forms of government...even from free democracies. History shows that once a government evolves into oligarcy they are tyrannical and are reliant on public servitude in order to exist. A well knownfictional oligarchy is represented in the book 1984 by George Orwell.
Robert Michels (a German socialologist) that any political system eventually evolves into oligarchy. He went on to say that modern democracies should be considered as oligarchies. In these systems actual differences between viable political rivals are small, the oligarchic elite impose strict limits on what constitutes an acceptable and respectable political position, and politicians careers DEPEND heavily on UNELECTED AND MEDIA ELITES. (Note prior discussion on CZARS and the mainstream media) Thus comes the popular phrase that there is only one political party...THE INCUMBANT PARTY!
Let me ask you this...does this sound familiar?...Corporate oligarcy is a form of POWER, governmental or operational, WHERE SUCH POWER effectively rest with a small elite group of INSIDE INDIVIDUALS, educational institutions, commercial entities such as banks, or large corporations (GE) that act in complicity with or at the whim of the oligarchy, OFTEN WITH NO REGARD FOR CONSTITUTIONALY PROTECTED PREOGATIVE. oTHER LARGE CORPORATIONS ARE TAKEN OVER BY THE GOVERNMENT OR BY THE LEAST REGULATED TO THE POINT THAT THEY CAN'T TAKE A CRAP WITHOUT GOVERNMENT APPROVAL.
We started on the road to Oligarcy in 1913 when ammendments to our orignal constitution opened the door for more government control...those who think that the constitution should be an absolute should examine the ammendments which changed the complection of the original document. We need to know what we're talking about when we shout from the mountain tops...DO NOT DEVIATE FROM THE CONSTITUTION! From the basic concept and the original document we should follow to the letter, but a door was opened to complete oilgarchy with the 16th ammendment (Starts collllateralization of American prosperity Feb 1913) The 17th ammendment effectively removes states from any role/check on Federal authority...which means no other law can serve to exceed a federal law or mandate (ARIZONA TODAY) and now comes the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT...which takes monotary matters out of the hands of the people and into the hands of the bankers and the world banks such as the IMF and of course out of the scrutiny and accountability to even our own congress.
Since 1913 our country regardless of party continues to change, little by little, dose by dose. In 1971 just about everything was in place for our government to be considered an oligarchy...Study up on the 16th ammendment, 17th ammendment, and the federal reserve act of 1913...This of course will give you a better understanding as to how we as a country have legislated ourseves right to where we are right now. Some say it's the excesses of the people...I say it's the excesses of government getting bigger and bigger. The next phase of our evolution is pure socialism, then comes communism, then total collapse...There is a solution, and I will go into that at a later date.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)